• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header left navigation
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
  • Home
  • Books
All Geek Things and All She Wrote

All Geek Things

Random thoughts of a crowded mind

  • Reviews
  • Xena
  • Blog

General

  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • About

Categories

  • Home
  • Features
  • Reviews
    • Loved you in this
  • TV & films
  • Xena
  • Pop culture
  • Business & marketing
  • Writing
  • Bookish
  • Random thoughts
  • Home
  • Features
  • Reviews
    • Loved you in this
  • TV & films
  • Xena
  • Pop culture
  • Business & marketing
  • Writing
  • Bookish
  • Random thoughts

Google+ abandons real name requirement policy

16 July, 2014 by PashaO
google
69
SHARES
ShareTweetPinterestBufferWhatsappDiggRedditTumblr

The people have spoken: Google has finally relented and is abandoning its \’real name requirement\’ policy. I can hear the keyboards of a thousand trolls warming up!

The Big G made the announcement on their Google+ page saying that there name restrictions were put in place to help create a community made up of real people. They realise that the policy excluded a number of people who wanted to be part of the community without having to use their real names.

Google admit that the names policy was unclear and led to unnecessarily difficult experiences for some users. They’ve been big about it and apologised and hope that the change is a step forward in making Google+ the welcoming and inclusive place they want it to be.




The ‘real name’ policy was put in place when Google+ first launched three years ago, so that people could have valuable conversations. This was Google’s attempt at limiting trolls and spammers. Despite this policy I’ve seen some keyboard warriors who are quite content to be as foul as ever. They got away with this because there was nothing in place to stop people from using fake ‘real names’.  This makes me wonder if the policy was worth the annoyance.

Google+ now has 343 million monthly active user accounts, according to data presented by Statista. The social network seems to have grown by enticing webmasters with Google Authorship as well as forcing users to create Google+ accounts in order to comment on YouTube videos. There’s even a Change.org petition about the latter. There are currently 240,077 signatures. It says:

Google is forcing us to make google+ accounts and invading our social life to comment on a youtube video and trying to take away our anonymous profile. They are also trying to censor us unless we share the same worldview as they do.




Backing down on the naming policy seems like a step in the right direction. Anonymity may have been a breeding ground for trolls but the policy was a definite setback for whistle-blowers and political protesters.

Business and marketing Google

Reader Interactions

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Sidebar

analytics text

Jetpack Stats new pricing module: What are your choices?

Unveiling pathways: Strategies for creatives to gain recognition

Spotify

Spotify’s balancing act: Celebrating wrapped success amid workforce reductions

Trending

  • Xena: Warrior Princess - Callisto Episodes
    Xena: Warrior Princess - Callisto Episodes
  • The evolution of musical episodes in television
    The evolution of musical episodes in television
  • Hercules and Xena Crossover Episodes
    Hercules and Xena Crossover Episodes
  • Xena: Warrior Princess: Callisto – The Lowdown
    Xena: Warrior Princess: Callisto – The Lowdown
  • Stargate SG-1: An iconic science fiction series
    Stargate SG-1: An iconic science fiction series
  • Cancelled too soon: Surface ‍
    Cancelled too soon: Surface ‍
  • Hercules and Xena the Dahak and Hope story
    Hercules and Xena the Dahak and Hope story
  • Unveiling pathways: Strategies for creatives to gain recognition
    Unveiling pathways: Strategies for creatives to gain recognition

Socials

  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · All Geek Things · All Rights Reserved